Moral knowledge and the existence of god

Abstract In this essay, I argue that, all else being equal, theism is more probable than naturalism on the assumption that human beings are able to arrive at a body of moral knowledge largely accurate and complete. put forth thesis grounds if true, explanation content our intuitions terminates either in biological-evolutionary processes or social conventions adopted for pragmatic reasons; so, were selected their utility, not truth; so selected, they probably false. defend argument against three objections: first, amounts generic skeptical challenge; second, ethical explains how could have been third, there pre-established harmony between utility beliefs truth-values.